This other researcher, informed myself
that while on a walking trip in Scotland, he had got chatting to
a man who during there conversations Told "N". That he
was a N.A.T.O Tornado Jet pilot. During there walk and
convesations they discussed a Number of things including the now
Infamous flying triangles.."N" had told me that he
asked the direct question to the pilot.
"So what happened with that
Sheffield thing". "N" informed me that The pilot
informed him that it was the Americans fault that night, and also
stated that there was indeed a dead N.A.T.O pilot involved during
this incident with the flyimg triangle.
I would also like to draw your attention
to a rather strange occurrence that happened, when Mr Mark Bell
of the W.U.F.O.G Group who has also produced a CD-Rom, which
includes the Sheffield incident as part of its contents. He was
at I believe LBC radio in London promoting the CD-Rom, Before he
went on the air they asked him about what he wished to talk about
and one of the things he told them was the Sheffield case. Just
before he went on air. He was informed that he could not talk
about the Sheffield incident. I feel that this was rather strange
Behaviour from the radio station.
Is there a D notice non reporting of the
Flying triangle in our media. Or is the Sheffield case under a D
notice restriction? For more info about the happenings at the
radio station you can contact Mark Bell at firstname.lastname@example.org Ok now that I hope that I
have brought you up
to speed regarding this case, lets move on with a brief
summary before we get to the conclusions.
The nights events for me began on
24 March 1997 with a telephone call to my home at about 21.55,
from the witness Emma Maidenhead. During my investigation it has
become apparent that there are eight clear witnesses to the UFO,
with a number of other possible reports contained in the police
log. There were multiple sonic booms or air explosions occurring
at 21.52 and 22.06 and the UFO was tracked on radar between the
time frame of 21.55 to 22.05. (The radar track occurred in
between the sonic occurrences.) The triangle appears to have been
intercepted by the military jets, as is confirmed by three of the
witnesses. A covert low flying mission taking place at the time
was booked to be on the ground at approximately 21.07. The
question must be asked why were the jets still in the air over
thirty minutes after they were booked to land? This is in breach
of orders, unless of course they were ordered to intercept the
UFO, this would explain why they were in the air well after they
were booked to land.
The military still have not admitted to
causing the sonic booms or air explosions, which occurred at
21.52 and 22.06 but the M.O.D have changed their version of
events on at least four occasions. Why would a training mission
warrant such secrecy and denials, after all is said and done
training missions are pretty mundane!
The triangle was seen in the area by
five clear independent witnesses, another three witnesses all saw
the glowing orange object moving across the night sky over the
town of Dronfield, the city of Sheffield and the surrounding
rural areas. Three of the witnesses to the triangle saw the
triangle either being escorted or intercepted by six military
jets, six of the triangle sightings occurred between the time
frame of 21.45 to 22.15.The weather conditions on that night
were, clear skies with very little cloud cover and only a light
breeze, therefore the possibility of atmospheric conditions
causing the sonic events must be discounted.
I believe a number of questions need
Were there any other military aircraft
over the skies of the UK on the 24th March 1997? The fact that
there were three clear sightings by members of the public who saw
the jets in very close proximity to the Triangle, almost 30
minutes after they were booked to return, should preclude the
answer. Unless in fact the jets involved in the incident, were
involved in a covert low flying mission, and were told to
intercept the triangle.
The jets were there thirty minutes after
they were booked to land why?
Were these jets not connected to the
ones on the low flying training mission? Jets were in the area
between the time frame of 21.45 to 22.00. This coincides with the
numerous reports of UFOs that I have collated over the last
The witnesses are quire clear that what
they saw was neither, a plane or a meteorite, in particular to
the report to the police by, Mr Bryan Haslam who reported his
sighting of the flying triangle at 19.40. Although this was two
hours before the main aspects of the incident it should not be
discounted, the police felt it prudent enough to include it in
the incident log. His sighting occurred while it was still just
daylight, he was quite clear about what he saw.
I feel that questions remain unanswered
about events over the Peak District on the 24th March 1997. The
fact that the M.O.D. have changed their version of events on a
number of occasions shows that something is not quite right. All
these changing stories are just not warranted for something as
mundane as a training exercise.
Perhaps most significant is the taped
testimony of Mr Jonathan Dagenhart a member of the RAF, who in no
uncertain terms stated that he encountered a man on Snake Pass
(in the Peak District) about 1 hour after the sonic events or air
explosions occurred who was stinking of aviation fuel, this was
within a couple of miles of where the incident occurred. He has
since tried to retract his statement informing me that he had
been spoken to!
When I asked him to elaborate he stated
that he was not allowed to comment with regard to who had spoken
to him. Let us now look at the conclusions.
The Sheffield Incident... March 24th
1997 - Timed duration of incident 19.40 to 23.45
First of all we must look at the eye
witness testimonies. At this point I would like to state that
none of the witnesses to the Triangle have met or spoken to each
other, nor have they read each others statements. Further to this
I would like to state that I have either spoken to witnesses in
person or taken their statements directly from the police log.
Bryan Haslam, saw the triangle at 19.40
he said to the police "I was on a train between Sheffield to
Keighley, around the Barnsley area I saw a triangular shaped
object hovering near the railway line, it was lit up all around.
There's no point in you looking for a crashed plane it definitely
wasn't a plane." "Thinks we are wasting are time".
Bryan is adamant about what he saw
The fact that, this sighting was
included in the police log of the incident plus the fact that it
is obviously a valid UFO sighting, reported to the police on the
25th March concerning events on the 24th March 1997 confirms that
Helen Jackson MP has been lied to during the tabling of questions
in the House of Parliament. The question then needs answering why
is a Member of Parliament being lied to? This is a very serious
Why have the MOD taken the stance that
they have if nothing occurred that night? Emma Maidenhead, saw
the triangle at 21.45 - 21.48. "The triangle UFO flew
straight over the house in Dronfield heading towards the moors,
it was at a height of approximately 200/300ft and had pink /
cerise type lights." These were around what she described as
the front. Emma also stated that it had "a huge circular
almost blinding electric blue light underneath and it was humming
like the sound an electrical substation makes or wet power lines
but much louder." Emma felt quite ill for about thirty
minutes after the incident.
Dan Grayson, saw the triangle at least
one and a half hours after the sonic events or air explosions
occurred 23.30 - 23.45. Dan had the triangle in sight for fifteen
minutes. "It was huge, triangular in shape and hovering
silently, then it slowly moved off, it was being shadowed by an
unmarked black helicopter." This sighting was within a mile
and a half of where the sonic events or air explosions occurred
and within three miles of where Jonathan Dagenhart encountered
the man who smelt of aviation fuel. Husband and wife - new
I was also contacted by two more
witnesses to the flying triangle, in the Parsons Cross, area of
Sheffield. This is just about in a direct line between Dronfield
and High Bradfield, in the time frame and in the flight path.
Although I have not seen the full hand written statement from
these witnesses it is apparent that these witnesses have also
seen the triangle at very close proximity and described it as
being the size of a 747 jet. Apparently three jets flew over at
high speed and low altitude, then a few moments later the
triangle appeared. It was, according to the husband and wife,
just after the triangle had disappeared from view that three more
jets came over. All the jets and the triangle were at the same
height and traveling in the same direction. At present I am
waiting for the full hand written statement.
All five witnesses are clearly
describing the same object. All of these sightings occurred on
the west side of the city of Sheffield bordering the Peak
Mr. Rhodes saw a glowing orange object
heading over the Ridgeway towards the Peaks. He believed it to be
a UFO and had been looking for a UFO hotline to report the
sighting to this occurred at 21.50.
Mrs Dronfield saw a cigar shaped object
coming from the direction of High Bradfield it was very low and
glowing orange, it disappeared behind the houses towards the
Strines area .I believe that these two witnesses saw the triangle
from the side so that it would appear cigar shaped. PC Jarvis saw
a bright object moving across the night sky, from Stannington
towards High Bradfield, but he thought it was Hale Bopp.
OK let's now look at all the witnesses
to the military jets in the area on the night of the 24th March
1997. These witness statements are very important to proving the
involvement of the authorities in a cover-up of the events.
Bearing in mind that the RAF at first denied even having any
planes in the air that night, the military have now at least
admitted to having planes over the North Sea, the jets were
witnessed taking off from RAF Conningsby at 20.45 on the night of
March 24th but apparently they were nowhere near the Peak
Update: The MOD have now claimed
that they were involved in a covert low flying exercise on the
24th March 1997. Tony Megson and Paul Bradley both saw and heard
jets flying low and fast over Shire Green in Sheffield heading in
the direction of the Dronfield area. This occurred at 21.45. Both
teams in a football game and their supporters all saw and heard
the jets flying over Dronfield at 21.45 on the night of the 24th
March 1997. Emma Maidenhead witnessed six Tornados flying low and
fast at the same height as the UFO and heading in the same
direction, they were traveling in pairs about twenty seconds
apart. There were also helicopters and light aircraft in the
area. In her words, "It was like an air show I have never
seen so much air traffic in the sky over a built up area at the
same time." This all occurred between 21.45 - 21.48. Mr.
Brassington (ex RAF officer) reported to the police that between
the time frame of 21.30 - 22.00 "Two RAF jets came over low
fast then a twin engine plane circled twice over Dronfield very
Now I feel we should look at the
evidence regarding the radar operator from RAF Linton On Ouse.
The UFO was tracked on radar for a ten
minute period from 21.55 at RAF Linton On Ouse.
When the radar operator was re-contacted
on the 26th March by his friend of 16 years who he had been to
school with he said "I cannot make any further comment or I
will be in breach of my national security oath."(Official
It has been alleged since that the radar
was not operating on the 24th March 1997 however, the
triangle sightings coincided with the military activity in the
skies over the town of Dronfield, the city of Sheffield, and the
surrounding rural areas. For the radar operator to have made the
whole thing up I believe, is a statistical improbability. Why
would a radar operator from the Royal Signals at Linton on Ouse
have fabricated the radar tracking of the UFO? It is not an
option, his evidence is too precise to be made up.
Two sonic booms were registered over the
Sheffield area, the first one at 21.52 and the second sonic boom
was 14 minutes, later at 22.06. The authorities made an
announcement to the media that a Bolide meteor exploding in the
atmosphere caused the sonic boom and was also responsible for all
the reports of a crashed plane, that was before I discovered the
second and earlier sonic boom at 21.52. Incidentally the two
sonic booms are either side of the radar operators statement that
he tracked a UFO on radar at 21.55 until 22.05.
The radar operator stated that he could
not discuss the events of March 24th or he would be in breach of
his national security oath (official secrets act). Well the
question begs, how would a Bolide meteor under any circumstance
be in respect of national security unless we are expecting some
sort of Bolide meteor attack!
With the discovery of the earlier sonic
boom at 21.52, perhaps the authorities will now state that it was
in fact two Bolide meteors. Or will they claim that a Bolide
meteor traveling at thousands of miles an hour exploded then hung
around in the atmosphere over Sheffield for a full 14 minutes,
exploded again and that the laws of physics cease to exist over
Update: It has now been confirmed that
there was no space debris in the atmosphere over Northern England
on the 24th March 1997. It also proves the lengths
that the authorities will go to in the placement of cover
stories. It confirms what I have been saying all along, that
there were in fact no Bolide meteors
This I feel completely exposes the
Bolide meteor cover story and immediately implicates the
authorities in a conspiracy to conceal the facts from the public.
The Bolide meteor debunking exercise has been used countless
times across the world to cover up well documented UFO sightings,
other debunker favorites include, a weather balloon, a flock of
birds, swamp gas, the planet Venus and yes the Bolide meteor.
So the question remains what is the
connection between credible documented UFO sightings and the
sudden appearance of the Bolide meteor phenomena. Well it seems
obvious they are one and the same thing, the cover story that
fitted the situation best from the World Governments manual - How
to debunk a UFO flap.
The governments of the world do not deny
that UFO's exist but they deny that they are extra terrestrial in
origin coming from the MJ12 / Project sign / Blue Book / Grudge
agenda, which all stem from a larger group known as the Jason
I also have in my possession sixteen
documents recovered from the public records office at Kew London.
These confirm at least seven secret
departments, operating inside the armed forces who have been
carrying out investigations into the subject of UFO's in a covert
manner, including the sending out of field operatives to
interview witnesses pertaining to UFO sightings, as well as
interaction between similar
American groups, and the playing down of
the whole subject so as to not fuel an outcry for a public
investigations into the subject of UFO's in the Houses of
In one communication, between UK and US
groups, it is mentioned, with regard to UFO's here in the UK,
that as we play down the subject, UFO's have only been mentioned
in the houses of Parliament once in the last five or six years,
(60's) and then only in a perfunctory way. All these secret
groups who the MOD claim do not exist, all operate behind the
scenes of the front window letter writing UFO office at
Whitehall, now known as Air Staff 2a.
The following day men of unknown origin
were active in the area and were involved in the nights events,
looking like C.I.D. in twin aerial cars they were questioning
witnesses without showing any ID.
Sharon Aldridge, and her friend were
circled by an unmarked black helicopter.
Just after they heard the whirring noise
near the Strines Reservoir. So clearly helicopters were on the
scene at least an hour before the rescue services were called
out. Then there is the sighting by Mr Dan Grayson of an unmarked
black helicopter ghosting the triangle between 23.30 and 23.45.
On the news desk at Hallam FM Mr. James
Harvey stated that the police were not being forthcoming when
further inquiries were made regarding the night of March 24th. He
felt they were being uncooperative and evasive when he approached
the police press office at South Yorkshire Police Headquarters.
Triangle data is avaliable from at least
20 other countries around the world, immediately discounting
claims made in some areas that these craft are part of some top
secret British Stealth type project, well this simply does not
hold water. For a start why fly a top secret craft over a built
Identical sightings of these 200/300ft
Triangles being sighted in at least 20 other countries further
discounts the terrestrial top secrets crafts idea. It is hardly a
top secret when at least 20 other countries around the world
would it appear have the same 200/300ft triangular shaped craft
which have the control of gravity. Not much of a secret if you
ask me, so by rational alone these triangles are not terrestrial,
although I believe the British Government may be test flying a
smaller 30-50ft triangle around the north west of England at the
moment. Probably built with recovered ET technology.
These larger triangular craft are I
believe without doubt extra terrestrial in origin. also
terrestrial I believe that due to the amount of triangle
sightings around the planet.
We are dealing with both. As well as
that I will go as far as to say that some of these triangles are
being flown and controlled by the beings known as the 'Greys'.
One of my abductees from the Leeds area clearly remembers without
the use of hypnotic regression being floated up into a triangle
craft on the 3rd July 1996 at 11.30 while sunbathing in a field
near her home. She remembers a hexagon shaped room and being
surrounded by 6 small 'Grays', the tests and contact with a five
foot gray being who said he was 'the doctor'. The encounter
included mind scan, telepathy and the loss of 3 hours of time.
But that's another story.
The RAF set up a dangerous flying zone
was also set up for a ten mile radius around Howden Moors. Then
there is the testimony of the new age traveler who said that the
military had lost a Tornado jet and the pilot. Mr. Morton and his
mother saw an orange glow then plumes of smoke from their home at
Bolderstone over towards Featherbed Top. A straight line from
their home passes through Howden reservoir.
Leicester Arkwright (unsubstantiated at
this time) Claims to have seen the RAF pulling bodies out of the
Howden reservoir just before midday on the 25th March. The
authorities called the search off 60 minutes later.
Then there is the original statement
from Mr Dagenhart who is a member of the RAF. Who with no doubt
in his mind what so ever stated that about 23.00 he encountered a
man on the small viaduct at Ladybower reservoir, who was stinking
of aviation fuel.
It is without doubt that the military
are involved in a large cover up regarding the attempted
interception of the triangle, including conspiracy, the placement
of cover stories and debunking of witnesses.
The damming evidence from a member of
Royal Air Force, a jet engine specialist, who encountered the
pilot or the co-pilot on Snake Pass about an hour after the
explosions occurred, stinking of aviation fuel within three miles
of Howden Moors. This witness was 100% certain that he smelled
aviation fuel on the man he encountered while on a mini bus on
the 24th March 1997 until he was spoken to and had to retract his
There were no parked vehicles anywhere
in the area. The man smelled strongly of aviation fuel and was
said to be of easterly extraction. Indian/Pakistani and dressed
in dark brown clothing. The olive green flying suit worn by
pilots in the dark would appear to be dark brown, coupled with
the fact that he was smelling strongly of aviation fuel. He was
about three miles from Howden Reservoir.
If the distance of three miles had been
covered in 1 hour allowing for the time necessary to un-hitch his
parachute then walking at 3-4 miles an hour, it would place him
exactly where he was encountered by the mini bus.
I feel that this is without doubt the
pilot or the co-pilot of a Tornado jet who was soaked in aviation
fuel and was making his way to the nearest metropolis so as to
alert the military. (As was reported by the new age traveler when
he said the RAF have lost a jet and the pilot).
If the man had broken down or run out of
fuel most people would say,
"I have run out of fuel or I have
broken down can you give me a lift," this man just said
"I need to get to Sheffield" without giving any
explanation as why he was stinking of aviation fuel. The normal
behavior would have been to explain your predicament so as to
Through a source Mr. Dagenhart
has been ordered to retract his statement. He however would not
tell me who had contacted him and ordered him to retract his
statement. I reiterate to you all, I have the Dagenhart tape and
he first of all made all comments freely and without prompting.
The RAF are trying to make someone
retract a statement about something that they claim never
happened anyway WHY ?
Planes landing at Manchester airport
adjust incoming flight paths accordingly. A copy of the notam had
been impossible for me to obtain. I had been given the run-around
over it by West Drayton A.I.S man Mr. Robert Farugia who sent me
all over the UK between Mr. Banning's office, his assistant Mr.
Jakes (the civil aviation authority) and then over to Manchester
airport. Then I was moved all over the shop by Manchester air
traffic control, then Mrs. Doreen Hampson gave me the fob off. I
was finally told that the notam had been filed in the archive and
that without the notam number it would be impossible to retrieve
the notam. When I asked how to obtain the notam number I was
politely told that the notam number would be printed on the top
of the notam. (Notice to airman)
I have finally been able to obtain the
notam (notice to airman) from the A.I.S at Heathrow airport, but
have left the original notes so as you can be aware of how
difficult it had been for me to obtain the above..
And the fact that I was given the
run-around by the authorities concerning the temporary danger
With regard to the Bolide meteor
hypothesis, the following statement also completely contradicts
the Bolide story.
Statement from the USA Geological Survey
( bolide meteor characteristics)
USGS - US Geological Survey, Woods Hole
What is a Bolide? There is no consensus
on its definition, but we use it to mean an extraterrestrial body
in the 1-10-km size range, which impacts the earth at velocities
of literally faster than a speeding bullet (20-70 km/sec = Mach
75), explodes upon impact, and creates a large crater. " is
a generic term, used to imply that we do not know the precise
nature of the impacting body . . . whether it is a rocky or
metallic asteroid, or an icy comet, for example.
No mention of the Bolide exploding in
the atmosphere or causing sonic booms, I feel this must now
completely debunk the authorities Bolide meteor theory the facts
of the night of the 24th March 1997 are not even consistent with
a professional description of a Bolide meteor.
Although it has now been
confirmed that there was no space debris over the north of
England on the 24th March 1997.
I have kept all the data in the report
so as you can be aware of how many different versions of events
the authorities have been using as it became necessary to modify
the cover story so as to keep apace with the veracity of my
These changes in tack by the MOD should
not have been necessary if, as they now state, the events that
transpired were the result of something as mundane as a low-level
training mission. A training mission that, I must point out,
should have landed at 21.20, the time it was booked to end. This
strangely however is 25 minutes before the incident occurred, so
were the jets seen at the time of the incident totally separate
from those participating in the low level training mission ? If
not why were they still in the air half an hour after they were
booked to land?
The military are usually sharp and
prompt when it comes to military timetables, they do not accept
easily pilots who disregard orders. The question then begs, were
the jets seen during the time of the Sheffield
Incident involved in the training mission, which the
military at first claimed took place over the North Sea? Were
they instructed to intercept the UFO? Would that not explain why
they were in the air thirty minutes after they were supposed to
I feel the evidence leads strongly to
the distinct possibility that a jet has crashed and I must
conclude that something had in fact impacted or exploded on the
24th March 1997.
The MOD as with all military
establishments tend to police their own and therefore I believe
it is very unlikely that they would report themselves to the CAA
with regard to RAF jets breaching the sound barrier over the
I believe that they were in pursuit of
the triangle over the Peak District. I also feel that the
explosions were not sonic booms after all but were in fact air
explosions caused either by one of the jets exploding or the
discharge of weapons. It could even have been the use of an EM
weapon which either discharged or affected the electronics on
board of one of the tornado jets causing it to explode or crash
while in close proximity of the triangle.
1.Fact..Airborne ECM (Electronic Counter
Measures) can knock out enemy radar, blanketing it in high
powered radiation and causing complete loss of screen images, or
confusing it with multiple plots.
2.Fact..EMP from a nuclear burst known
as a 'click' it can destroy radio, radar and electrical circuits,
or simply stop them working for a while, depending on the
strength of the burst, if this is true It is hardly surprising
that the government want to suppress this evidence.
It is without doubt that, given the
chain of events that occurred, the triangle data pointing to them
often traveling in pairs and that the authorities seem to be
lying about events over the Peaks between 19.40 and 23.45 on the
If it was just a Tornado gone down on a
training exercise, like many have over the years, there would
have been no need to conceal the loss the jet from the media.
Unless of course something far more serious had occurred with
mitigating circumstances and they just could not afford the risk
of any exposure so the cover story was put out. The Bolide meteor
story that is, but that has been debunked with the double sonic
booms recorded and, at first, the denials of aircraft in the
area. Other stories about the night of the 24th March have done
the rounds, including it was a drug drop, or it was a micro light
club prank, (Hudson Valley sightings 1980 - New York), or it was
a ghost plane. All designed to confuse the issue and get people
into a situation where they do not know what to believe.
This is nothing more or less than a
covert classic cover-up with all the usual dis-information.
Whether, the air explosions were sonic
booms, or a tornado jet exploding and a sonic boom, or a tornado
jet exploding and the discharge of weapons, or the triangle going
supersonic, the damming testimony of a member of the RAF who can
positively confirm with no doubt in his mind what so ever that he
encountered a man on the viaduct approx, 1 hour after the
explosions were heard, stinking of aviation fuel proves there is
more to the evenings events than what the public have been led to
believe. I feel that they could not announce that a Tornado had
crashed, as they could not afford to have the media crawling all
over the area and risk any chance of this incident being exposed.
I therefore must conclude that, The
Tornado jet has crashed either due to pilot error or
malfunctioned. Because of the use of EM technology in the
propulsion system of this craft which has affected the electrical
systems of the Jet while being in close proximity of the Triangle
causing the pilot to lose control while being involved in this
low level interception.
Or that the triangle has released an EM
burst known as a click which has knocked out the systems of the
jet causing the jet to crash.
It is possible that this triangle craft
may have been some new military hardware. With the jets as an
escort or perhaps they were on some sort of war games to test the
capability of such a craft, maybe one of the jets has crashed due
to pilot error or malfunction.
If such advanced aircraft as the FT
exists, there are a number of questions that remain unanswered:-
Why would they be test flown, low, over
heavily built up areas of the U.K? Such an aircraft would be
designated 'Top Secret' and normally flown from establishments
such as Boscombe Down. The military simply would not test fly
something of such advanced technology over urban areas if
they wished to keep this advanced craft a secret from:
A: The public
B: Other foreign powers who are always
on the lookout for new technology. Through intelligence gathering
and the chance of obtaining such technology through industrial
espionage, so as to at least maintain the status quo or gain the
advantage in avionics and weapon systems for the defense of their
own nation states.
It is foolish to even consider that a
country, which won two wars through its intelligence gathering
and its ability to keep its military secrets safe from foreign
powers, would fly these triangles without a care in the World.
For all to see when these craft show technology far in advance of
anything that is as advertised as being part of the UK defense
With all the triangle sightings from at
least twenty other countries across the planet, are we to believe
that all these countries have designed and built and test flying
these craft at the same time, which would constitute a massive
breach of security for the originator of the technology.
Digest the evidence and I hope you will
agree that the above points are the only rational conclusions
that can be drawn. Based on the first rate corroborated evidence
and, may I also use the word substantiated, testimonies of
credible public sector employees, former military witnesses and
the observant professional people from the Sheffield area.
I hereby state, that the evidence
contained in this dossier is what I believe to be a true and
accurate statement regarding the sighting and military contact,
culminating in the loss of at least one N.A.T.O Tornado jet and
pilot or co-pilot during an encounter with what I believe to be
1.An extra terrestrial spacecraft on the
24th March 1997.
2.A craft of terrestrial of origin and
Obviously my research into this incident
is ongoing and I will keep you informed of any further
I would also like to thank you for
taking the time to examine my research, if any of the readers
have any information regarding this case, however insignificant
you may feel it is I would be pleased to look at it. We need each
other if we are going to get to the bottom of the UFO enigma,
lets start working together on this.
Your comments are welcome on this matter.
Maxwell Brierley Burns -
UFO researcher / journalist
Omar Fowler (author) The Flying Triangle Mystery, The Continuing Story, which is available from
The Phenomena Research Association, 94 The Spot, Sinfin, Derby De24
Matthew Williams, Sobeps Belgium, Martin Jeffrey,
Nina Pendread, (editor) Alien Encounters Magazine,
Victor Kean (Project F.T ), Miles Johnson, Glen Ford, The British Geological
Survey, UFO Round-up, Stuart Guthrie, USA Geological Survey and Rebecca Jackson.
Maxwell Brierley Burns, United Kingdom
Reprinted with permission of the author.
© Copyright 1998